[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61e752c5-ed1b-4b9b-8bdc-0562d2fbc828@stanley.mountain>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 10:42:58 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 3/7] zram: rework recompress target selection strategy
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 11:09:08AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> +static struct zram_pp_slot *select_pp_slot(struct zram_pp_ctl *ctl)
> +{
> + struct zram_pp_slot *pps = NULL;
> + s32 idx = NUM_PP_BUCKETS - 1;
> +
> + /* The higher the bucket id the more optimal slot post-processing is */
> + while (idx > 0) {
Why is this not idx >= 0? Why skip the first bucket?
regards,
dan carpenter
> + pps = list_first_entry_or_null(&ctl->pp_buckets[idx],
> + struct zram_pp_slot,
> + entry);
> + if (pps)
> + break;
> +
> + idx--;
> + }
> + return pps;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists