[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96fd7bd9-3525-44e0-b797-55d4e82f9c37@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 09:54:45 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Oscar Salvador
<osalvador@...e.de>, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tdx, memory hotplug: Check whole hot-adding memory range
for TDX
> Because only TDX compatible memory can be used for TDX guest. The buddy
> is used to allocate memory for TDX guest. While devdax will not be used
> for that.
>
>>> This also makes the original TDX memory hotplug notifier useless, so
>>> delete it.
>>
>> The online-notifier would even be too late when used with the
>> memmap-on-memory feature I assume, as we might be touching that memory
>> even before being able to call memory online notifiers.
>
> This should be OK. Because we will not use the memory for TDX guest in
> this way.
Thanks for the reminder, I keep assuming that we are hotplugging memory
into the guest, not the hypervisor.
Having that as a comment in tdx_check_hotplug_memory_range() would be
helpful: we don't allow mixture of TDX and !TDX memory in the buddy so
we won't run into trouble when launching encrypted VMs that really need
TDX-capable memory.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists