[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241001075858.48936-9-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 15:58:51 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <yunshenglin0825@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v19 08/14] mm: page_frag: use __alloc_pages() to replace alloc_pages_node()
It seems there is about 24Bytes binary size increase for
__page_frag_cache_refill() after refactoring in arm64 system
with 64K PAGE_SIZE. By doing the gdb disassembling, It seems
we can have more than 100Bytes decrease for the binary size
by using __alloc_pages() to replace alloc_pages_node(), as
there seems to be some unnecessary checking for nid being
NUMA_NO_NODE, especially when page_frag is part of the mm
system.
CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
---
mm/page_frag_cache.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_frag_cache.c b/mm/page_frag_cache.c
index 6f6e47bbdc8d..a5448b44068a 100644
--- a/mm/page_frag_cache.c
+++ b/mm/page_frag_cache.c
@@ -61,11 +61,11 @@ static struct page *__page_frag_cache_refill(struct page_frag_cache *nc,
#if (PAGE_SIZE < PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE)
gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) | __GFP_COMP |
__GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC;
- page = alloc_pages_node(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp_mask,
- PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_ORDER);
+ page = __alloc_pages(gfp_mask, PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_ORDER,
+ numa_mem_id(), NULL);
#endif
if (unlikely(!page)) {
- page = alloc_pages_node(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp, 0);
+ page = __alloc_pages(gfp, 0, numa_mem_id(), NULL);
order = 0;
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists