[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ca919f5ffa5d8c94b7e594206421675a741c3a3.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 11:04:40 +0200
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Ilpo Järvinen
<ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby
<jirislaby@...nel.org>,
linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko
Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tty: serial: handle HAS_IOPORT dependencies
On Mon, 2024-04-08 at 12:17 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024, at 11:54, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Apr 2024, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>
> > > config SERIAL_8250_CS
> > > tristate "8250/16550 PCMCIA device support"
> > > - depends on PCMCIA && SERIAL_8250
> > > + depends on PCMCIA && SERIAL_8250 && HAS_IOPORT
> > > help
> > > Say Y here to enable support for 16-bit PCMCIA serial devices,
> > > including serial port cards, modems, and the modem functions of
> >
> > What about drivers that use SERIAL8250_PORT()?
>
> It probably makes sense to hide these, since they won't ever
> work. I probably missed them in my initial series because they
> don't cause a compile-time error, but I agree that there is no
> use in showing the options here.
>
As far as I can tell SERTIAL8250_PORT() is used by SERIAL_8250_ACCENT,
SERIAL_8250_BOCA, and SERIAL_8250_EXAR_ST16C554 all of these already
depend on ISA which implies HAS_IOPORT. So I don't think we need to add
HAS_IOPORT dependencies here?
Thanks,
Niklas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists