[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DM6PR12MB45167DD7F11B0CF99E0E4622D8772@DM6PR12MB4516.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 10:04:01 +0000
From: Danielle Ratson <danieller@...dia.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "davem@...emloft.net"
<davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"yuehaibing@...wei.com" <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Petr Machata
<petrm@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: ethtool: Add support for writing
firmware blocks using EPL payload
> From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> Sent: Monday, 30 September 2024 19:42
> To: Danielle Ratson <danieller@...dia.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com;
> kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com; yuehaibing@...wei.com; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: ethtool: Add support for writing
> firmware blocks using EPL payload
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 11:46:37AM +0300, Danielle Ratson wrote:
> > In the CMIS specification for pluggable modules, LPL (Low-Priority
> > Payload) and EPL (Extended Payload Length) are two types of data
> > payloads used for managing various functions and features of the module.
> >
> > EPL payloads are used for more complex and extensive management
> > functions that require a larger amount of data, so writing firmware
> > blocks using EPL is much more efficient.
> >
> > Currently, only LPL payload is supported for writing firmware blocks
> > to the module.
> >
> > Add support for writing firmware block using EPL payload, both to
> > support modules that supports only EPL write mechanism, and to
> > optimize the flashing process of modules that support LPL and EPL.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@...dia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -556,6 +563,49 @@ __ethtool_cmis_cdb_execute_cmd(struct
> net_device *dev,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > +#define CMIS_CDB_EPL_PAGE_START 0xA0
> > +#define CMIS_CDB_EPL_PAGE_END 0xAF
> > +#define CMIS_CDB_EPL_FW_BLOCK_OFFSET_START 128
> > +#define CMIS_CDB_EPL_FW_BLOCK_OFFSET_END 255
> > +
> > +static int
> > +ethtool_cmis_cdb_execute_epl_cmd(struct net_device *dev,
> > + struct ethtool_cmis_cdb_cmd_args *args,
> > + struct ethtool_module_eeprom *page_data) {
> > + u16 epl_len = be16_to_cpu(args->req.epl_len);
> > + u32 bytes_written;
> > + u8 page;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + for (page = CMIS_CDB_EPL_PAGE_START;
> > + page <= CMIS_CDB_EPL_PAGE_END && bytes_written < epl_len;
> > +page++) {
>
> bytes_written does not seem to be initialised here for the first iteration of the
> loop.
>
> Flagged by W=1 builds with clang-18.
You are right, I mistakenly sent the wrong version. Will send the fixed one.
Thanks.
>
> > + u16 offset = CMIS_CDB_EPL_FW_BLOCK_OFFSET_START;
> > +
> > + while (offset <= CMIS_CDB_EPL_FW_BLOCK_OFFSET_END &&
> > + bytes_written < epl_len) {
> > + u32 bytes_left = epl_len - bytes_written;
> > + u16 space_left, bytes_to_write;
> > +
> > + space_left = CMIS_CDB_EPL_FW_BLOCK_OFFSET_END
> - offset + 1;
> > + bytes_to_write = min_t(u16, bytes_left,
> > + min_t(u16, space_left,
> > + args->read_write_len_ext));
> > +
> > + err = __ethtool_cmis_cdb_execute_cmd(dev,
> page_data,
> > + page, offset,
> > + bytes_to_write,
> > + args->req.epl +
> bytes_written);
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + offset += bytes_to_write;
> > + bytes_written += bytes_to_write;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static u8 cmis_cdb_calc_checksum(const void *data, size_t size) {
> > const u8 *bytes = (const u8 *)data;
>
> ...
>
> --
> pw-bot: changes-requested
Powered by blists - more mailing lists