[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241001121902.658d3977@xps-13>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 12:19:02 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Hui-Ping Chen <hpchen0nvt@...il.com>
Cc: richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, nikita.shubin@...uefel.me, arnd@...db.de,
vkoul@...nel.org, esben@...nix.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: nuvoton,ma35d1-nand: add new
bindings
Hi Hui-Ping,
hpchen0nvt@...il.com wrote on Fri, 27 Sep 2024 02:07:48 +0000:
> Add dt-bindings for the Nuvoton MA35 SoC NAND Controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hui-Ping Chen <hpchen0nvt@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> ---
> .../bindings/mtd/nuvoton,ma35d1-nand.yaml | 93 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nuvoton,ma35d1-nand.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nuvoton,ma35d1-nand.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nuvoton,ma35d1-nand.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a8a549644c98
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nuvoton,ma35d1-nand.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mtd/nuvoton,ma35d1-nand.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Nuvoton MA35D1 NAND Flash Interface (NFI) Controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Hui-Ping Chen <hpchen0nvt@...il.com>
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: nand-controller.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - nuvoton,ma35d1-nand-controller
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + clocks:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> +patternProperties:
> + "^nand@[a-f0-9]$":
> + type: object
> + $ref: raw-nand-chip.yaml
> + properties:
> + nand-ecc-step-size:
> + enum: [512, 1024]
> +
> + nand-ecc-strength:
> + enum: [8, 12, 24]
> +
> + required:
> + - nand-ecc-step-size
> + - nand-ecc-strength
No, they should not be required, unless there is a good reason to do
so. Optimal strength is discoverable, stop forcing it by default.
> +
> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - interrupts
> + - clocks
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/nuvoton,ma35d1-clk.h>
> +
> + soc {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + nand-controller@...A0000 {
> + compatible = "nuvoton,ma35d1-nand-controller";
> + reg = <0x0 0x401A0000 0x0 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 38 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&clk NAND_GATE>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + nand@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> +
> + nand-on-flash-bbt;
> + nand-ecc-step-size = <512>;
> + nand-ecc-strength = <8>;
> +
> + partitions {
> + compatible = "fixed-partitions";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> +
> + uboot@0 {
> + label = "nand-uboot";
> + read-only;
> + reg = <0x0 0x300000>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
> +...
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists