[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQCbJNnTtWtLPYz=5Y-5Tk9UaoU4EVDp_dayzhekT055A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 11:18:04 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/23] kbuild: simplify find command for rustfmt
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 3:38 AM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 4:17 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The correct use of the -prune option can be seen in the 'make clean'
> > rule.
>
> Yeah, this `-prune` should not have been like that -- sorry about that.
>
> The comment above this recipe should be updated.
>
> I am not sure I understand the part of the commit message about the
> rust/test change. Do you mean that we should use `srctree` in case
> there is a stale one in the source tree from a previous
> non-completely-clean in-source-tree build?
Correct.
> I think the original
> intention was to skip the objtree one if it were a subdir of srctree
> (and that is why the use of absolute paths).
OK, understood.
If you insist on the current logic, I will keep it as-is,
but I need to replace $(abs_objtree) with $(CURDIR)
because $(abs_objtree) will be removed by this series.
> Although I think we can simplify further by just removing the logic
> about `rust/test`, since we don't generate `*.rs` files there anyway
> at the moment.
OK, then we can remove -prune entirely.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists