Message-ID: <ZvvwJXuaFzttwchv@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 08:50:45 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, arnd@...db.de, bbrezillon@...nel.org,
	boris.brezillon@...labora.com, conor.culhane@...vaco.com,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	pthombar@...ence.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] MAINTAINERS: I3C: Add Frank Li as nxp I3C
 controller driver maintainer

On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 12:10:27PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Frank.li@....com wrote on Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:08:06 -0400:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 06:22:35PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > Hi Frank,
> > >
> > > Frank.li@....com wrote on Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:05:32 -0400:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 10:16:09AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > > > > Add Frank Li as NXP i3c controller driver as maintainer and add mail list
> > > > > imx@...ts.linux.dev for it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Add Frank Li as I3C subsystem reviewer.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> > > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Miquel:
> > > > 	Any comments?
> > >
> > > I guess we'll happily take your feedback on patches targeting the SVC
> > > driver, you've been working a lot on it. However, in general there has
> > > been a lot of discussions happening on your substantial patchsets and
> > > little to no convergence in the end.
> >
> > I think this can't prevent no any feedback at this thread for more than
> > 1 month.
>
> Well, there's been a lot of discussion, then no convergence, that's
> what I am pointing out as well. You cannot say there has been no
> discussion.

Yes, but I can't understand what's that related with this independent
thread. and it is fact of no feedback on this thread over 1 months and
missed one merge windows.

I read your comments again.
"I understand you want to push your patches upstream and I also want to
make things move forward",

I think you mis-understand that I want to be maintainer to make ungoing
patch "i3c: master: some fix and improvemnt for hotjoin" go forward.

That no convergence patch is i3c common master part, not svc driver part.
Even I become svc maintainer, no help for go forward at all.

>
> > Basic, this patch did two things,
>
> Actually 3, and this is usually too much.
>
> > one add mail list imx@...ts.linux.dev to
> > keep us track all imx related patch in one mail list. generally, we don't
> > check linux-i3c mail list frequently.
> >
> > The other things is add me to maintainer, If you have concern about it.
> > You'd better said as
> > - point to the path to be maintainer, such as do reviewer first for some
> > times.
> > - or simple reject this, I can post the patch, which only add
> > imx@...ts.linux.dev.
> >
> > Keep simple, two questions:
> > 1: are you agree on add imx@...ts.linux.dev?
> > 2: are you agree on I as reviewer?
>
> I've already answered these questions and made a difference between
> reviewing driver changes and core changes.

Can you explicite anwer yes/No for above 2 items, so I rework patches.

Frank

>
> > > I understand you want to push your
> > > patches upstream and I also want to make things move forward, but maybe
> > > one of the reasons for the stalls is the lack of fluent exchanges
> > > between us and the difficulty to explain bigger pictures in a clear
> > > way.
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
>
> --
> linux-i3c mailing list
> linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c

Powered by blists - more mailing lists