[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zvv5HpBjzo_T5rub@gpd3>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 15:29:02 +0200
From: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@...ux.dev>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Provide a per-scheduler unique sequence
counter
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 08:33:17AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Andrea.
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 06:59:01PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> ...
> > @@ -662,6 +662,13 @@ struct sched_ext_ops {
> > */
> > u64 hotplug_seq;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * enable_seq - unique per-scheduler counter that can be accessed from
> > + * user-space to determine if a scheduler (within a specific hierarchy)
> > + * has been restarted.
> > + */
> > + s64 enable_seq;
>
> Let's just make it a global variable for now. When we package up context for
> each scheduler instance into a struct, it will get packaged up together.
> It's a bit odd to add enable_seq to ops as userspace can't do anything with
> it (note that hotplug_seq is different in that it's provided by the
> userspace on load).
Yep, makes sense, I just sent it because it was mentioned in the other
thread about enable_seq, but we don't really need it right now, so we
can just ignore it for now.
Thanks,
-Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists