[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <047034ae-135b-4ce9-a407-9b2a00841324@baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 08:42:23 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@...libre.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de,
michael.hennerich@...log.com, gstols@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] iio: adc: ad7606: add support for AD7606C-{16,18}
parts
On 10/1/24 3:26 AM, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 4:05 PM Alexandru Ardelean
> <aardelean@...libre.com> wrote:
>>
...
>> @@ -153,7 +349,19 @@ static int ad7606_scan_direct(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, unsigned int ch,
>> if (ret)
>> goto error_ret;
>>
>> - *val = sign_extend32(st->data[ch], 15);
>> + chan = &indio_dev->channels[ch + 1];
>> + if (chan->scan_type.sign == 'u') {
>> + if (storagebits > 16)
>> + *val = st->data.buf32[ch];
>> + else
>> + *val = st->data.buf16[ch];
>> + return 0;
>
> Arrggh...
> I messed up here.
> Guillaume found a bug here, where this should be "goto error_ret" or
> do an "if () {} else {}"
> How should we do it here?
>
> Do we send a fix-patch or send a new series?
>
Since this patch is already applied, just follow up with another
patch with a Fixes: tag.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists