[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<OSQPR06MB7252FD4C5AC99A9714DA46E48B702@OSQPR06MB7252.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 17:02:34 +0000
From: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, "robh@...nel.org"
<robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "joel@....id.au"
<joel@....id.au>, "andrew@...econstruct.com.au"
<andrew@...econstruct.com.au>, "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, BMC-SW <BMC-SW@...eedtech.com>,
"Peter.Yin@...ntatw.com" <Peter.Yin@...ntatw.com>, "Jay_Zhang@...ynn.com"
<Jay_Zhang@...ynn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] gpio: aspeed: Add the flush write to ensure the
write complete.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 11:43 AM Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Performing a dummy read ensures that the register write operation is fully
> > > > > completed, mitigating any potential bus delays that could otherwise impact
> > > > > the frequency of bitbang usage. E.g., if the JTAG application uses GPIO to
> > > > > control the JTAG pins (TCK, TMS, TDI, TDO, and TRST), and the application
> > > > > sets the TCK clock to 1 MHz, the GPIO’s high/low transitions will rely on
> > > > > a delay function to ensure the clock frequency does not exceed 1 MHz.
> > > > > However, this can lead to rapid toggling of the GPIO because the write
> > > > > operation is POSTed and does not wait for a bus acknowledgment.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com>
> > > >
> > > > If this applies cleanly on mainline I think it should go into fixes as-is.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > > >
> > > > Yours,
> > > > Linus Walleij
> >
> > > I agree but it doesn't. :(
> >
> > > Billy: please send it separately and - while at it - use a C-style comment.
> >
> > > Bart
> >
> > Hi Linus Walleij and Bart,
> >
> > Sorry, I don’t quite understand the meaning of “send it separately.”
> > Does this mean I need to send this patch individually after the GPIO patch series has been accepted?
> >
> This is a fix, meaning: it should go upstream now and get backported
> to stable branches. The other patches from this series will go in the
> next merge window in two months or so. So send this as the first patch
> in the series with an appropriate Fixes: tag or even send it entirely
> independently from the rest.
> Bart
Got it. Thanks for your prompt response.
I will include this as the first patch in the next version.
Billy Tsai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists