[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37fbc082-6bda-46e3-9ee7-9240b41f26fd@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 19:24:12 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"Rick P. Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@...aro.org>,
Ross Burton <ross.burton@....com>,
David Spickett <david.spickett@....com>,
Yury Khrustalev <yury.khrustalev@....com>,
Wilco Dijkstra <wilco.dijkstra@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 16/40] KVM: arm64: Manage GCS access and registers
for guests
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 04:55:25PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > + if (!kvm_has_gcs(kvm))
> > > + kvm->arch.fgu[HFGxTR_GROUP] |= (HFGxTR_EL2_nGCS_EL0 |
> > > + HFGxTR_EL2_nGCS_EL1);
> > Why are you still allowing the GCS instructions when GCS isn't
> > enabled?
> Scratch that, they are NOPs when GCS isn't enabled, so there shouldn't
> be any need for extra traps.
They are, though really they should UNDEF if GCS isn't there (which I
had thought was what you were referencing here). Equally we only have
traps for a subset of GCS instructions and it's not like there aren't a
whole bunch of untrappable extensions anyway so it's not clear it's
worth the effort just for that.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists