[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e76c13a-16bc-4f2b-be45-a4161bfe6136@os.amperecomputing.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 12:50:51 -0700
From: Yang Shi <yang@...amperecomputing.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Cc: jgg@...pe.ca, james.morse@....com, will@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix L1 stream table index
calculation for 32-bit sid size
On 10/2/24 12:22 PM, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 12:04:32PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 10:55:14AM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
>>>> +static inline unsigned int arm_smmu_strtab_max_sid(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return (1ULL << smmu->sid_bits);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>> Hmm, why ULL gets truncated to unsigned int here?
>> No particular reason, but it should be better to not truncate here. Will
>> fix it.
> Yea, and looks like we are going to do with:
> static inline u64 arm_smmu_strtab_num_sids(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
Since this is an inline function, so the truncate should actually
happens when it is used. But anyway using the correct type does make the
code less confusing.
>
> Then let's be careful at those return-value holders too:
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> static int arm_smmu_init_strtab_linear(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> {
> u32 size;
> struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg *cfg = &smmu->strtab_cfg;
>
> size = (1 << smmu->sid_bits) * sizeof(struct arm_smmu_ste);
> ^^^^
> overflow?
> [...]
> cfg->linear.num_ents = 1 << smmu->sid_bits;
> ^^^^^^^^
> This is u32
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks
> Nicolin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists