[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZRg+k=N42EA3+3c4Er=DHf2Q1aVzzCM0OQuEx7xWMAvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 22:46:41 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Drew Fustini <dfustini@...storrent.com>
Cc: Drew Fustini <drew@...7.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Fu Wei <wefu@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille@...tlin.com>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] pinctrl: Add T-Head TH1520 SoC pin controllers
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 8:35 PM Drew Fustini <dfustini@...storrent.com> wrote:
> > Then I merged that into my "devel" branch for v6.13.
>
> Thanks for taking this. Will that also end up in linux-next eventually?
Yes next -next.
> I'm working on a TH1520 Ethernet driver which depends on the pinctrl
> driver. Andrew Lunn replied to me that all the dependencies need to be
> in linux-next [1].
Well compile-time dependencies for sure, run-time dependencies
we are usually a bit lax with as long as we know they will
get there eventually.
> > I think I'll make a stab at using guarded mutexes etc and see what
> > you think about it!
>
> Do you mean using scoped_guard() for thp->mutex in
> th1520_pinctrl_dt_node_to_map()?
For all mutex and spinlocks in the driver.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists