[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <172790675948.3079764.14344518438206067809.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 15:06:07 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...nel.org,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com,
sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf/test: perf test 86 fails on s390
On Tue, 01 Oct 2024 14:42:23 +0200, Thomas Richter wrote:
> Command perf test 86 fails on s390:
> # perf test -F 86
> ping 868299 [007] 28248.013596: probe_libc:inet_pton_1: (3ff95948020)
> 3ff95948020 inet_pton+0x0 (inlined)
> 3ff9595e6e7 text_to_binary_address+0x1007 (inlined)
> 3ff9595e6e7 gaih_inet+0x1007 (inlined)
> FAIL: expected backtrace entry \
> "main\+0x[[:xdigit:]]+[[:space:]]\(.*/bin/ping.*\)$"
> got "3ff9595e6e7 gaih_inet+0x1007 (inlined)"
> 86: probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping : FAILED!
> #
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists