[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024100246-gladly-overfed-75b9@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 11:23:54 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Alex Lanzano <lanzano.alex@...il.com>,
Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait@...tlin.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christophe Jaillet <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] drm/tiny: Add driver for Sharp Memory LCD
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 10:56:42AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/sharp-memory.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,681 @@
> …
> > +static int sharp_memory_maintain_display(struct sharp_memory_device *smd)
> > +{
> …
> > + u8 *tx_buffer = smd->tx_buffer;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&smd->tx_mutex);
> …
> > + mutex_unlock(&smd->tx_mutex);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> …
>
> Will development interests grow for the application of a statement
> like “guard(mutex)(&smd->tx_mutex);”?
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc1/source/include/linux/mutex.h#L201
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists