[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <472d2dcc-82ce-44f3-b991-6aba1e4d18f9@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 10:45:22 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Alessandro Zanni <alessandro.zanni87@...il.com>, joro@...tes.org,
will@...nel.org
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org, anupnewsmail@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/dma: Potential uninitialized variable in
iommu_dma_unmap_sg
On 2024-10-02 9:31 am, Alessandro Zanni wrote:
> This patch fix the possibility to have the variable 'start'
> not initialized.
Why should it need initialising though? For "start" to never be set,
then either sg_dma_is_bus_address() is true for the whole list, or the
list is bogus and has sg_dma_len()==0 on the very first segment. Either
way, the second loop will then do nothing, "if (end)" will remain false,
and thus "start" will not be used. Where's the bug?
Thanks,
Robin.
> Smatch tool raises the error:
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c:1510
> iommu_dma_unmap_sg() error: uninitialized symbol 'start'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alessandro Zanni <alessandro.zanni87@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index 2a9fa0c8cc00..5b2596f4b24f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ int iommu_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
> void iommu_dma_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
> enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
> {
> - dma_addr_t end = 0, start;
> + dma_addr_t end = 0, start = 0;
> struct scatterlist *tmp;
> int i;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists