[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241002012042.2753174-2-nphamcs@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 18:20:42 -0700
From: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org,
yosryahmed@...gle.com,
hughd@...gle.com,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
ryan.roberts@....com,
ying.huang@...el.com,
chrisl@...nel.org,
david@...hat.com,
kasong@...cent.com,
willy@...radead.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
baohua@...nel.org,
chengming.zhou@...ux.dev,
v-songbaohua@...o.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
kernel-team@...a.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] swap: shmem: remove SWAP_MAP_SHMEM
The SWAP_MAP_SHMEM state was introduced in the commit aaa468653b4a
("swap_info: note SWAP_MAP_SHMEM"), to quickly determine if a swap entry
belongs to shmem during swapoff.
However, swapoff has since been rewritten in the commit b56a2d8af914
("mm: rid swapoff of quadratic complexity"). Now having swap count ==
SWAP_MAP_SHMEM value is basically the same as having swap count == 1,
and swap_shmem_alloc() behaves analogously to swap_duplicate(). The only
difference of note is that swap_shmem_alloc() does not check for
-ENOMEM returned from __swap_duplicate(), but it is OK because shmem
never re-duplicates any swap entry it owns. This will stil be safe if we
use (batched) swap_duplicate() instead.
This commit adds swap_duplicate_nr(), the batched variant of
swap_duplicate(), and removes the SWAP_MAP_SHMEM state and the
associated swap_shmem_alloc() helper to simplify the state machine (both
mentally and in terms of actual code). We will also have an extra
state/special value that can be repurposed (for swap entries that never
gets re-duplicated).
Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
---
include/linux/swap.h | 16 ++++++++--------
mm/shmem.c | 2 +-
mm/swapfile.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index ca533b478c21..017f3c03ff7a 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -232,7 +232,6 @@ enum {
/* Special value in first swap_map */
#define SWAP_MAP_MAX 0x3e /* Max count */
#define SWAP_MAP_BAD 0x3f /* Note page is bad */
-#define SWAP_MAP_SHMEM 0xbf /* Owned by shmem/tmpfs */
/* Special value in each swap_map continuation */
#define SWAP_CONT_MAX 0x7f /* Max count */
@@ -482,8 +481,7 @@ void put_swap_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry);
extern swp_entry_t get_swap_page_of_type(int);
extern int get_swap_pages(int n, swp_entry_t swp_entries[], int order);
extern int add_swap_count_continuation(swp_entry_t, gfp_t);
-extern void swap_shmem_alloc(swp_entry_t, int);
-extern int swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t);
+extern int swap_duplicate_nr(swp_entry_t, int);
extern int swapcache_prepare(swp_entry_t entry, int nr);
extern void swap_free_nr(swp_entry_t entry, int nr_pages);
extern void swapcache_free_entries(swp_entry_t *entries, int n);
@@ -549,11 +547,7 @@ static inline int add_swap_count_continuation(swp_entry_t swp, gfp_t gfp_mask)
return 0;
}
-static inline void swap_shmem_alloc(swp_entry_t swp, int nr)
-{
-}
-
-static inline int swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t swp)
+static inline int swap_duplicate_nr(swp_entry_t swp, int nr)
{
return 0;
}
@@ -606,6 +600,12 @@ static inline int add_swap_extent(struct swap_info_struct *sis,
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SWAP */
+static inline int swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+ return swap_duplicate_nr(entry, 1);
+}
+
+
static inline void free_swap_and_cache(swp_entry_t entry)
{
free_swap_and_cache_nr(entry, 1);
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index 0613421e09e7..e3f72f99be32 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -1561,7 +1561,7 @@ static int shmem_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
__GFP_HIGH | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN,
NULL) == 0) {
shmem_recalc_inode(inode, 0, nr_pages);
- swap_shmem_alloc(swap, nr_pages);
+ swap_duplicate_nr(swap, nr_pages);
shmem_delete_from_page_cache(folio, swp_to_radix_entry(swap));
mutex_unlock(&shmem_swaplist_mutex);
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 0cded32414a1..9bb94e618914 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -1381,12 +1381,6 @@ static unsigned char __swap_entry_free_locked(struct swap_info_struct *si,
if (usage == SWAP_HAS_CACHE) {
VM_BUG_ON(!has_cache);
has_cache = 0;
- } else if (count == SWAP_MAP_SHMEM) {
- /*
- * Or we could insist on shmem.c using a special
- * swap_shmem_free() and free_shmem_swap_and_cache()...
- */
- count = 0;
} else if ((count & ~COUNT_CONTINUED) <= SWAP_MAP_MAX) {
if (count == COUNT_CONTINUED) {
if (swap_count_continued(si, offset, count))
@@ -3626,7 +3620,6 @@ static int __swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t entry, unsigned char usage, int nr)
offset = swp_offset(entry);
VM_WARN_ON(nr > SWAPFILE_CLUSTER - offset % SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
- VM_WARN_ON(usage == 1 && nr > 1);
ci = lock_cluster_or_swap_info(si, offset);
err = 0;
@@ -3652,6 +3645,13 @@ static int __swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t entry, unsigned char usage, int nr)
err = -EEXIST;
} else if ((count & ~COUNT_CONTINUED) > SWAP_MAP_MAX) {
err = -EINVAL;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * The only swap_duplicate_nr() caller that passes nr > 1 is shmem,
+ * who never re-duplicates any swap entry it owns. So this should
+ * not happen.
+ */
+ VM_WARN_ON(nr > 1 && (count & ~COUNT_CONTINUED) == SWAP_MAP_MAX);
}
if (err)
@@ -3686,27 +3686,28 @@ static int __swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t entry, unsigned char usage, int nr)
return err;
}
-/*
- * Help swapoff by noting that swap entry belongs to shmem/tmpfs
- * (in which case its reference count is never incremented).
- */
-void swap_shmem_alloc(swp_entry_t entry, int nr)
-{
- __swap_duplicate(entry, SWAP_MAP_SHMEM, nr);
-}
-
-/*
- * Increase reference count of swap entry by 1.
+/**
+ * swap_duplicate_nr() - Increase reference count of nr contiguous swap entries
+ * by 1.
+ *
+ * @entry: first swap entry from which we want to increase the refcount.
+ * @nr: Number of entries in range.
+ *
* Returns 0 for success, or -ENOMEM if a swap_count_continuation is required
* but could not be atomically allocated. Returns 0, just as if it succeeded,
* if __swap_duplicate() fails for another reason (-EINVAL or -ENOENT), which
* might occur if a page table entry has got corrupted.
+ *
+ * Note that we are currently not handling the case where nr > 1 and we need to
+ * add swap count continuation. This is OK, because no such user exists - shmem
+ * is the only user that can pass nr > 1, and it never re-duplicates any swap
+ * entry it owns.
*/
-int swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t entry)
+int swap_duplicate_nr(swp_entry_t entry, int nr)
{
int err = 0;
- while (!err && __swap_duplicate(entry, 1, 1) == -ENOMEM)
+ while (!err && __swap_duplicate(entry, 1, nr) == -ENOMEM)
err = add_swap_count_continuation(entry, GFP_ATOMIC);
return err;
}
--
2.43.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists