[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c547e1aa-f894-409e-9033-f370c5c16171@igalia.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 22:40:17 -0300
From: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <gabriel@...sman.be>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-dev@...lia.com,
Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com>, smcv@...labora.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/10] tmpfs: Add casefold lookup support
Hey Krisman,
Em 12/09/2024 16:04, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi escreveu:
> André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com> writes:
>
[...]
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE)
>> + if (ctx->encoding) {
>> + sb->s_encoding = ctx->encoding;
>> + sb->s_d_op = &shmem_ci_dentry_ops;
>> + if (ctx->strict_encoding)
>> + sb->s_encoding_flags = SB_ENC_STRICT_MODE_FL;
>> + }
>> #else
>> - sb->s_flags |= SB_NOUSER;
>> + sb->s_d_op = &simple_dentry_operations;
>
> Moving simple_dentry_operations to be set at s_d_op should be a separate
> patch.
>
> It is a change that has non-obvious side effects (i.e. the way we
> treat the root dentry) so it needs proper review by itself. It is
> also not related to the rest of the case-insensitive patch.
>
The idea of setting simple_dentry_operations come from my previous
approach of having our own shmem_lookup(), replacing simple_lookup().
Now that we are settled to keep with simple_lookup() anyway (that
already sets simple_dentry_operations), I think we don't need this
change anymore, right?
This will be set for every dentry that doesn't have a
dentry->d_sb->s_d_op. Case-insensitive mount points will have this set,
so we don't risk overwriting it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists