[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=L2XVh7a_dJpmtMzK554dkKRj+0FDd7OdVY3+UMmirHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 14:18:15 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@...il.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] compiler-gcc.h: Disable __retain on gcc-11
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 9:25 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:
>
> - * Optional: only supported since gcc >= 11, clang >= 13
> + * Optional: only supported since gcc >= 11 (partial), clang >= 13
Hmm... "partial" does not give much information -- perhaps something like:
* Optional: only supported since gcc >= 11 (partial, see
compiler-gcc.h), gcc >= 12, clang >= 13
What do you think?
With something like that:
Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists