[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <92a3bdfd-7b40-4524-aecf-cd3c3b54be67@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 15:22:47 +0300
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] clk: twl: add TWL6030 support
On 02/10/2024 14:07, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> The TWL6030 has similar clocks, so add support for it. Take care of the
> resource grouping handling needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
> ---
> drivers/clk/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/clk/clk-twl.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> index 299bc678ed1b..82ec12f9b82c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ config CLK_TWL
> help
> Enable support for controlling the clock resources on TWL family
> PMICs. These devices have some 32K clock outputs which can be
> - controlled by software. For now, only the TWL6032 clocks are
> + controlled by software. For now, the TWL6032 and TWL6030 clocks are
> supported.
>
> config CLK_TWL6040
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-twl.c b/drivers/clk/clk-twl.c
> index 1d684b358401..f3a52f568887 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-twl.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-twl.c
> @@ -11,13 +11,26 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> -#define VREG_STATE 2
> +#define VREG_STATE 2
> +#define VREG_GRP 0
> #define TWL6030_CFG_STATE_OFF 0x00
> #define TWL6030_CFG_STATE_ON 0x01
> #define TWL6030_CFG_STATE_MASK 0x03
> +#define TWL6030_CFG_STATE_GRP_SHIFT 5
> +#define TWL6030_CFG_STATE_APP_SHIFT 2
> +#define TWL6030_CFG_STATE_APP_MASK (0x03 << TWL6030_CFG_STATE_APP_SHIFT)
> +#define TWL6030_CFG_STATE_APP(v) (((v) & TWL6030_CFG_STATE_APP_MASK) >>\
> + TWL6030_CFG_STATE_APP_SHIFT)
> +#define P1_GRP BIT(0) /* processor power group */
> +#define P2_GRP BIT(1)
> +#define P3_GRP BIT(2)
> +#define ALL_GRP (P1_GRP | P2_GRP | P3_GRP)
> +
> +#define DRIVER_DATA_TWL6030 0
> +#define DRIVER_DATA_TWL6032 1
how about using enum here?
enum twl_type {
TWL_TYPE_6030,
TWL_TYPE_6032,
};
>
> struct twl_clock_info {
> - struct device *dev;
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
I wouldn't change this.
Instead, you can add twl_type member here and initialize it in probe.
enum twl_type type;
> u8 base;
> struct clk_hw hw;
> };
> @@ -56,14 +69,21 @@ static unsigned long twl_clks_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> static int twl6032_clks_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> {
> struct twl_clock_info *cinfo = to_twl_clks_info(hw);
> - int ret;
>
> - ret = twlclk_write(cinfo, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_STATE,
> - TWL6030_CFG_STATE_ON);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - dev_err(cinfo->dev, "clk prepare failed\n");
> + if (platform_get_device_id(cinfo->pdev)->driver_data == DRIVER_DATA_TWL6030) {
this changes to
if (cinfo->type == TWL_TYPE_6030)
> + int grp;
>
> - return ret;
> + grp = twlclk_read(cinfo, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_GRP);
> + if (grp < 0)
> + return grp;
> +
> + return twlclk_write(cinfo, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_STATE,
> + grp << TWL6030_CFG_STATE_GRP_SHIFT |
> + TWL6030_CFG_STATE_ON);
> + }
> +
> + return twlclk_write(cinfo, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_STATE,
> + TWL6030_CFG_STATE_ON);
> }
>
> static void twl6032_clks_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> @@ -71,10 +91,16 @@ static void twl6032_clks_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> struct twl_clock_info *cinfo = to_twl_clks_info(hw);
> int ret;
>
> - ret = twlclk_write(cinfo, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_STATE,
> - TWL6030_CFG_STATE_OFF);
> + if (platform_get_device_id(cinfo->pdev)->driver_data == DRIVER_DATA_TWL6030)
here too.
> + ret = twlclk_write(cinfo, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_STATE,
> + ALL_GRP << TWL6030_CFG_STATE_GRP_SHIFT |
> + TWL6030_CFG_STATE_OFF);
> + else
> + ret = twlclk_write(cinfo, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_STATE,
> + TWL6030_CFG_STATE_OFF);
> +
> if (ret < 0)
> - dev_err(cinfo->dev, "clk unprepare failed\n");
> + dev_err(&cinfo->pdev->dev, "clk unprepare failed\n");
> }
>
> static const struct clk_ops twl6032_clks_ops = {
> @@ -137,7 +163,7 @@ static int twl_clks_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> cinfo[i].base = hw_data[i].base;
> - cinfo[i].dev = &pdev->dev;
> + cinfo[i].pdev = pdev;
here we can initialize twl type like so.
cinfo[i].type = platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
> cinfo[i].hw.init = &hw_data[i].init;
> ret = devm_clk_hw_register(&pdev->dev, &cinfo[i].hw);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -159,7 +185,11 @@ static int twl_clks_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> static const struct platform_device_id twl_clks_id[] = {
> {
> + .name = "twl6030-clk",
> + .driver_data = DRIVER_DATA_TWL6030,
TWL_TYPE_6030
> + }, {
> .name = "twl6032-clk",
> + .driver_data = DRIVER_DATA_TWL6032,
TWL_TYPE_6032
> }, {
> /* sentinel */
> }
--
cheers,
-roger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists