[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a8ed16ffc65d587ed2ff2d1e95bd61fdca5cc90.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 05:28:04 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>, Patrick Miller
<paddymills@...ton.me>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Dwaipayan Ray
<dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>, Miguel
Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Wedson
Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary
Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas
Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, Hridesh MG <hridesh699@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] checkpatch: warn on known non-plural rust doc
headers and empty doc comments
On Wed, 2024-10-02 at 13:56 +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> We already have other checks for Rust files that are shared with other
> languages. Perhaps we can be slightly more clear with "checks for Rust
> files (only)" or "Rust-only checks" or "checks that only apply to Rust
> files"?
I'll get this sorted in the next week or so
and forwarded on.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists