[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=R_otRFu1J5X9Pam7u7t_K3t9fWDjEp03H=mKKT62CcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 14:46:17 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Hridesh Mg <hridesh699@...il.com>
Cc: Patrick Miller <paddymills@...ton.me>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] checkpatch: warn on known non-plural rust doc
headers and empty doc comments
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 2:31 PM Hridesh Mg <hridesh699@...il.com> wrote:
>
> In this case, I suppose it makes more sense to use the From: tag to signify ownership than Co-developed-by since the latter is used when multiple people work on the same patch according to https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by
Definitely, that is what I meant by the attribution part. If Patrick
carries your patch (applies it and sends it on your behalf), then Git
will add it automatically.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists