[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241003173225.7670a4f0@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 17:32:25 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Ingo
Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Mark
Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Alexander Shishkin
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, Joel
Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] tracing: Declare system call tracepoints with
TRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 11:16:31 -0400
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
> @@ -283,8 +290,13 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
> "RCU not watching for tracepoint"); \
> } \
> } \
> - __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), \
> - PARAMS(cond)) \
> + static inline void trace_##name##_rcuidle(proto) \
> + { \
> + if (static_key_false(&__tracepoint_##name.key)) \
> + __DO_TRACE(name, \
> + TP_ARGS(args), \
> + TP_CONDITION(cond), 1); \
> + } \
> static inline int \
> register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(data_proto), void *data) \
> { \
Looking at this part of your change, I realized it's time to nuke the
rcuidle() variant.
Feel free to rebase on top of this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241003173051.6b178bb3@gandalf.local.home/
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists