[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd889e4a-3da7-4ade-a0a4-c4fb1feb540f@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 23:53:56 +0200
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com,
wedsonaf@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com,
benno.lossin@...ton.me, a.hindborg@...sung.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, daniel.almeida@...labora.com,
faith.ekstrand@...labora.com, boris.brezillon@...labora.com,
lina@...hilina.net, mcanal@...lia.com, zhiw@...dia.com, cjia@...dia.com,
jhubbard@...dia.com, airlied@...hat.com, ajanulgu@...hat.com,
lyude@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 25/26] kbuild: rust: remove the `alloc` crate and
`GlobalAlloc`
On 10/3/24 11:41 PM, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 9:11 PM Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net> wrote:
>>
>> Would it make sense to throw in a soon-to-be-stable (or
>> already-stable-but-beyond-min-rust-version) feature here to not have to
>> remove the build system support for unstable feature directly?
>
> Yeah, agreed -- we are going to have `lint_reasons` and
> `arbitrary_self_types` before this series, so it should be fine.
So, I guess you'll just fix it up when applying the series?
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists