lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd04bbc8-8ebb-4091-b56d-32072587fa99@os.amperecomputing.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 17:36:12 -0700
From: Yang Shi <yang@...amperecomputing.com>
To: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@...gle.com>, Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Ryan Huang <tzukui@...gle.com>,
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix last_sid_idx calculation for
 sid_bits==32



On 10/2/24 10:58 AM, Daniel Mentz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 9:05 PM Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 06:53:57PM -0700, Daniel Mentz wrote:
>>> The function arm_smmu_init_strtab_2lvl uses the expression
>>>
>>> ((1 << smmu->sid_bits) - 1)
>>>
>>> to calculate the largest StreamID value. However, this fails for the
>>> maximum allowed value of SMMU_IDR1.SIDSIZE which is 32. The C standard
>>> states:
>>>
>>> "If the value of the right operand is negative or is greater than or
>>> equal to the width of the promoted left operand, the behavior is
>>> undefined."
>>>
>>> With smmu->sid_bits being 32, the prerequisites for undefined behavior
>>> are met.  We observed that the value of (1 << 32) is 1 and not 0 as we
>>> initially expected.
>>>
>>> Similar bit shift operations in arm_smmu_init_strtab_linear seem to not
>>> be affected, because it appears to be unlikely for an SMMU to have
>>> SMMU_IDR1.SIDSIZE set to 32 but then not support 2-level Stream tables
>>>
>>> This issue was found by Ryan Huang <tzukui@...gle.com> on our team.
>> There is a patch that's sent a few hours earlier :)
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20241001180346.1485194-1-yang@os.amperecomputing.com/
> Thanks Nicolin.
>
> Yang, in your change, I believe you are arguing based on the Arm spec
> ("dest = src << (shift % 32)"). Consider mentioning that the C
> standard states that this behavior is undefined.

OK, I will add this info to the commit log too.

>
>> Thanks
>> Nicolin
>>
>>> Fixes: ce410410f1a7 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add arm_smmu_strtab_l1/2_idx()")
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@...gle.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
>>> index 737c5b882355..b55327d6058e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
>>> @@ -3625,7 +3625,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_strtab_2lvl(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>>          u32 l1size;
>>>          struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg *cfg = &smmu->strtab_cfg;
>>>          unsigned int last_sid_idx =
>>> -               arm_smmu_strtab_l1_idx((1 << smmu->sid_bits) - 1);
>>> +               arm_smmu_strtab_l1_idx((1ULL << smmu->sid_bits) - 1);
>>>
>>>          /* Calculate the L1 size, capped to the SIDSIZE. */
>>>          cfg->l2.num_l1_ents = min(last_sid_idx + 1, STRTAB_MAX_L1_ENTRIES);
>>> --
>>> 2.46.1.824.gd892dcdcdd-goog
>>>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ