linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-x13s: model the PMU of the on-board wcn6855

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mde8rGT+81ViTX0Qj2sDrD59dkLHeUZd1xkWO_H=QvC0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 05:16:59 -0700
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-x13s: model the PMU of
 the on-board wcn6855

On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 13:38:35 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> said:
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 1:07 PM Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Without this patch I'm seeing an indefinite probe deferral with
>> 6.12-rc1:
>>
>>         platform 1c00000.pcie:pcie@0:wifi@0: deferred probe pending: pci-pwrctl-pwrseq: Failed to get the power sequencer
>>
>> Can you please look into that and make sure that the existing DT
>> continues to work without such warnings.
>>
>
> Ah, dammit, I missed the fact that X13s already has this node defined
> so PCI pwrctl will consume it and try to get the power sequencer
> handle. I'm wondering how to tackle it though... It will most likely
> require some kind of a driver quirk where we check if we have the PMU
> node and if not, then don't try to set up power sequencing. Any other
> ideas?
>

This is untested but would it make sense?

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pwrctl/pci-pwrctl-pwrseq.c
b/drivers/pci/pwrctl/pci-pwrctl-pwrseq.c
index a23a4312574b..071ee77c763d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pwrctl/pci-pwrctl-pwrseq.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pwrctl/pci-pwrctl-pwrseq.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
  * Copyright (C) 2024 Linaro Ltd.
  */

+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -87,7 +88,31 @@ static struct platform_driver pci_pwrctl_pwrseq_driver = {
 	},
 	.probe = pci_pwrctl_pwrseq_probe,
 };
-module_platform_driver(pci_pwrctl_pwrseq_driver);
+
+static int __init pci_pwrctl_pwrseq_init(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Old device trees for the Lenovo X13s have the "pci17cb,1103" node
+	 * defined but don't use power sequencing yet. If we register this
+	 * driver, it will match against this node and lead to emitting of
+	 * a warning in the kernel log when we cannot get the power sequencing
+	 * handle. Let's skip registering the platform driver if we're on X13s
+	 * but don't have the PMU node.
+	 */
+	if (of_machine_is_compatible("lenovo,thinkpad-x13s")) {
+		struct device_node *dn __free(device_node) =
+			of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "qcom,wcn6855-pmu");
+		if (!dn)
+			return 0;
+	}
+
+	return platform_driver_register(&pci_pwrctl_pwrseq_driver);
+}
+
+static void __exit pci_pwrctl_pwrseq_exit(void)
+{
+	platform_driver_unregister(&pci_pwrctl_pwrseq_driver);
+}

 MODULE_AUTHOR("Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Generic PCI Power Control module for power
sequenced devices");

X13s is the only platform that would use one of the compatibles supported by
this driver before power sequencing so it should be a one-off quirk.

Bart