linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] compiler-gcc.h: Disable _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72nGYFVFhhR_q1sHuLX4DsU339k=y4fdNc9L0e6vxRC8pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 14:42:49 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@...il.com>, 
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, 
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] compiler-gcc.h: Disable __retain on gcc-11

On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 2:28 PM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 2:11 PM Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >
> > A simple gcc version test definitely does not suffice.
>
> By build-time test, I meant compiling/running some small program to
> check whether the compiler supports the feature or not.

Ah, sorry, I missed the "definitely" in your message. I think I
misunderstood your message.

Cheers,
Miguel