linux-kernel - [PATCH v1] mmc: sdhci: Prevent stale command and data interrupt handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241003161007.3485810-1-m.wilczynski@samsung.com>
Date: Thu,  3 Oct 2024 18:10:07 +0200
From: Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@...sung.com>
To: adrian.hunter@...el.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
	paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
	m.szyprowski@...sung.com
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Michal Wilczynski
	<m.wilczynski@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] mmc: sdhci: Prevent stale command and data interrupt
 handling

While working with the T-Head 1520 LicheePi4A SoC, certain conditions
arose that allowed me to reproduce a race issue in the sdhci code.

To reproduce the bug, you need to enable the sdio1 controller in the
device tree file
`arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520-lichee-module-4a.dtsi` as follows:

&sdio1 {
	bus-width = <4>;
	max-frequency = <100000000>;
	no-sd;
	no-mmc;
	broken-cd;
	cap-sd-highspeed;
	post-power-on-delay-ms = <50>;
	status = "okay";
	wakeup-source;
	keep-power-in-suspend;
};

When resetting the SoC using the reset button, the following messages
appear in the dmesg log:

[    8.164898] mmc2: Got command interrupt 0x00000001 even though no
command operation was in progress.
[    8.174054] mmc2: sdhci: ============ SDHCI REGISTER DUMP ===========
[    8.180503] mmc2: sdhci: Sys addr:  0x00000000 | Version:  0x00000005
[    8.186950] mmc2: sdhci: Blk size:  0x00000000 | Blk cnt:  0x00000000
[    8.193395] mmc2: sdhci: Argument:  0x00000000 | Trn mode: 0x00000000
[    8.199841] mmc2: sdhci: Present:   0x03da0000 | Host ctl: 0x00000000
[    8.206287] mmc2: sdhci: Power:     0x0000000f | Blk gap:  0x00000000
[    8.212733] mmc2: sdhci: Wake-up:   0x00000000 | Clock:    0x0000decf
[    8.219178] mmc2: sdhci: Timeout:   0x00000000 | Int stat: 0x00000000
[    8.225622] mmc2: sdhci: Int enab:  0x00ff1003 | Sig enab: 0x00ff1003
[    8.232068] mmc2: sdhci: ACmd stat: 0x00000000 | Slot int: 0x00000000
[    8.238513] mmc2: sdhci: Caps:      0x3f69c881 | Caps_1:   0x08008177
[    8.244959] mmc2: sdhci: Cmd:       0x00000502 | Max curr: 0x00191919
[    8.254115] mmc2: sdhci: Resp[0]:   0x00001009 | Resp[1]:  0x00000000
[    8.260561] mmc2: sdhci: Resp[2]:   0x00000000 | Resp[3]:  0x00000000
[    8.267005] mmc2: sdhci: Host ctl2: 0x00001000
[    8.271453] mmc2: sdhci: ADMA Err:  0x00000000 | ADMA Ptr:
0x0000000000000000
[    8.278594] mmc2: sdhci: ============================================

I also enabled some traces to better understand the problem:

     kworker/3:1-62      [003] .....     8.163538: mmc_request_start:
mmc2: start struct mmc_request[000000000d30cc0c]: cmd_opcode=5
cmd_arg=0x0 cmd_flags=0x2e1 cmd_retries=0 stop_opcode=0 stop_arg=0x0
stop_flags=0x0 stop_retries=0 sbc_opcode=0 sbc_arg=0x0 sbc_flags=0x0
sbc_retires=0 blocks=0 block_size=0 blk_addr=0 data_flags=0x0 tag=0
can_retune=0 doing_retune=0 retune_now=0 need_retune=0 hold_retune=1
retune_period=0
          <idle>-0       [000] d.h2.     8.164816: sdhci_cmd_irq:
hw_name=ffe70a0000.mmc quirks=0x2008008 quirks2=0x8 intmask=0x10000
intmask_p=0x18000
     irq/24-mmc2-96      [000] .....     8.164840: sdhci_thread_irq:
msg=
     irq/24-mmc2-96      [000] d.h2.     8.164896: sdhci_cmd_irq:
hw_name=ffe70a0000.mmc quirks=0x2008008 quirks2=0x8 intmask=0x1
intmask_p=0x1
     irq/24-mmc2-96      [000] .....     8.285142: mmc_request_done:
mmc2: end struct mmc_request[000000000d30cc0c]: cmd_opcode=5
cmd_err=-110 cmd_resp=0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 cmd_retries=0 stop_opcode=0
stop_err=0 stop_resp=0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 stop_retries=0 sbc_opcode=0
sbc_err=0 sbc_resp=0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 sbc_retries=0 bytes_xfered=0
data_err=0 tag=0 can_retune=0 doing_retune=0 retune_now=0 need_retune=0
hold_retune=1 retune_period=0

Here's what happens: the __mmc_start_request function is called with
opcode 5. Since the power to the Wi-Fi card, which resides on this SDIO
bus, is initially off after the reset, an interrupt SDHCI_INT_TIMEOUT is
triggered. Immediately after that, a second interrupt SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE
is triggered. Depending on the exact timing, these conditions can
trigger the following race problem:

1) The sdhci_cmd_irq top half handles the command as an error. It sets
   host->cmd to NULL and host->pending_reset to true.
2) The sdhci_thread_irq bottom half is scheduled next and executes faster
   than the second interrupt handler for SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE. It clears
   host->pending_reset before the SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE handler runs.
3) The pending interrupt SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE handler gets called, triggering
   a code path that prints: "mmc2: Got command interrupt 0x00000001 even
   though no command operation was in progress."

To solve this issue, we need to clear pending interrupts when resetting
host->pending_reset. This ensures that after sdhci_threaded_irq restores
interrupts, there are no pending stale interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@...sung.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 4b91c9e96635..b91a6076c332 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -3098,6 +3098,10 @@ static bool sdhci_request_done(struct sdhci_host *host)
 		sdhci_reset_for(host, REQUEST_ERROR);
 
 		host->pending_reset = false;
+
+		/* Clear any pending interrupts after reset */
+		sdhci_writel(host, SDHCI_INT_CMD_MASK | SDHCI_INT_DATA_MASK,
+			     SDHCI_INT_STATUS);
 	}
 
 	/*
-- 
2.34.1