[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241003023702.4bam6cj5opcz24em@treble>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 19:37:02 -0700
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org, Jordan Rome <jordalgo@...a.com>,
Sam James <sam@...too.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] unwind, perf: sframe user space unwinding,
deferred perf callchains
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 10:31:25PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> +++ b/kernel/unwind/user.c
> @@ -177,7 +181,8 @@ int unwind_user_deferred(struct unwind_callback *callback, u64 *ctx_cookie)
>
> cookie = __this_cpu_read(ctx_ctr);
> cookie &= ((1UL << 48) - 1);
> - cookie |= ((cpu << 48) + 1);
> + cookie |= cpu << 48;
> + cookie++;
> __this_cpu_write(ctx_ctr, cookie);
>
> current->unwind_ctx_cookie = cookie;
>
> As the cookie never got incremented.
Ha, that might help ;-)
> That was just one issue. Things are still not working but I'll debug the
> rest later.
If you don't want to run on the bleeding edge, I'll be testing it soon
myself once I get the coding done for my v3.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists