[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADnq5_OKww1YZ1R_OytEMLcNVwdq=-ckc2gqQ+WMyOv6AZ9kqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 14:00:14 -0400
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To: "Sundararaju, Sathishkumar" <sasundar@....com>
Cc: Advait Dhamorikar <advaitdhamorikar@...il.com>, alexander.deucher@....com,
christian.koenig@....com, Xinhui.Pan@....com, airlied@...il.com,
simona@...ll.ch, leo.liu@....com, sathishkumar.sundararaju@....com,
saleemkhan.jamadar@....com, Veerabadhran.Gopalakrishnan@....com,
sonny.jiang@....com, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org, anupnewsmail@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next] Fix unintentional integer overflow
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 5:15 AM Sundararaju, Sathishkumar
<sasundar@....com> wrote:
>
>
> All occurrences of this error fix should have been together in a single patch both in _get and _set callbacks corresponding to f0b19b84d391, please avoid separate patch for each occurrence.
>
> Sorry Alex, I missed to note this yesterday.
I've dropped the patch. Please pick it up once it's fixed up appropriately.
Thanks,
Alex
>
>
> Regards,
> Sathish
>
>
> On 10/4/2024 1:46 PM, Advait Dhamorikar wrote:
>
> Fix shift-count-overflow when creating mask.
> The expression's value may not be what the
> programmer intended, because the expression is
> evaluated using a narrower integer type.
>
> Fixes: f0b19b84d391 ("drm/amdgpu: add amdgpu_jpeg_sched_mask debugfs")
> Signed-off-by: Advait Dhamorikar <advaitdhamorikar@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c
> index 95e2796919fc..7df402c45f40 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_jpeg.c
> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_jpeg_sched_mask_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> for (j = 0; j < adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings; ++j) {
> ring = &adev->jpeg.inst[i].ring_dec[j];
> if (ring->sched.ready)
> - mask |= 1 << ((i * adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings) + j);
> + mask |= (u64)1 << ((i * adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings) + j);
> }
> }
> *val = mask;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists