linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: convert test_xdp_features.sh to test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <24611a2f-ff5a-47e4-af48-9faad03273d3@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 08:23:52 +0200
From: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@...tlin.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
 Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
 Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
 Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>, ebpf@...uxfoundation.org,
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: convert test_xdp_features.sh
 to test_progs

On 10/4/24 06:44, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 9/24/24 6:37 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
>> There are other .sh tests that could better use the test_progs migration. In
>> particular the ones without existing test coverage. For non XDP related,
>> test_tcp_check_syncookie.sh, test_flow_dissector.sh, and test_tc_edt.sh should
>> be the good ones.
> 
> I just took a closer look at the test_tc_edt.* for another reason. It seems
> doing some bandwidth test which may not be a good fit (e.g. too flaky) for
> test_progs. I would leave it to the bottom of the todo list for now.

ACK, thanks

-- 
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com