[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241004192958.GA28441@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 21:29:59 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@...il.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paul@...l-moore.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pidfd: add ioctl to retrieve pid info
I wasn't CC'ed, so I didn't see the patch, but looking at Christian's
reply ...
On 10/04, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 at 10:29, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 03:24:33PM GMT, luca.boccassi@...il.com wrote:
> > > + info.pid = pid_nr_ns(pid, task_active_pid_ns(task));
> >
> > I think this is wrong what this should return is the pid of the process
> > as seen from the caller's pid namespace.
Agreed,
> Thanks for the review, I applied the rest of the comments in v2 (I
> think at least), but for this one I can't tell, how should I do it?
I guess Christian meant you should simply use
info.pid = task_pid_vnr(task);
task_pid_vnr(task) returns the task's pid in the caller's namespace.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists