[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <7E908DDE-0B55-4429-9F8D-A9719002E39A@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 23:12:09 +0200
From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acl: Realign struct posix_acl to reduce its size by 8
bytes
On 4. Oct 2024, at 22:11, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> On 4. Oct 2024, at 15:37, Jan Kara wrote:
>> On Fri 04-10-24 12:33:57, Thorsten Blum wrote:
>>> Reduce posix_acl's struct size by 8 bytes by realigning its members.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
>>
>> Looks good. Feel free to add:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>
> We should probably add:
>
> Fixes: b0ab04a8ffd8 ("acl: Annotate struct posix_acl with __counted_by()")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202409260949.a1254989-oliver.sang@intel.com
Just realized Christian dropped b0ab04a8ffd8 (although it's still in
linux-next). I guess we don't need these tags then.
> as this patch is also a workaround for a Clang __bdos() bug (see the
> Closes: link for details).
>
> Thanks,
> Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists