[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a1b78dd3-db42-4bf7-b004-e718b582e28c@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 14:18:25 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin
<hpa@...or.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, D Scott Phillips OS
<scott@...amperecomputing.com>, <carl@...amperecomputing.com>,
<lcherian@...vell.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>,
<tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>, <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Jamie Iles
<quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
<peternewman@...gle.com>, <dfustini@...libre.com>, <amitsinght@...vell.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>, Dave
Martin <dave.martin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/40] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to
/fs/resctrl
Hi James,
While you wait for folks to consider these changes, could you please take a look
at [1] from an Arm/MPAM perspective? My understanding is that Arm/MPAM also
requires assigning counters to do monitoring and [1] aims to create
a generic interface to do so. Is [1] something that Arm/MPAM can build on
or are there some changes that can be made before its inclusion to help
with future MPAM support?
Thank you
Reinette
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1725488488.git.babu.moger@amd.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists