linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 0/5] hyper-v: Don't assume cpu_possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <SN6PR02MB4157B9D2128314E34E2F646DD4722@SN6PR02MB4157.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 23:34:46 +0000
From: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org"
	<patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org>
CC: Michael Kelley <mhkelley58@...il.com>, "kys@...rosoft.com"
	<kys@...rosoft.com>, "haiyangz@...rosoft.com" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
	"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>, "decui@...rosoft.com"
	<decui@...rosoft.com>, "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
	"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "x86@...nel.org"
	<x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "joro@...tes.org"
	<joro@...tes.org>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
	"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>, "davem@...emloft.net"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com"
	<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, "martin.petersen@...cle.com"
	<martin.petersen@...cle.com>, "iommu@...ts.linux.dev"
	<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] hyper-v: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Sent: Friday, October 4, 2024 4:26 PM
> 
> On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 23:20:40 +0000 patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
> wrote:
> >   - [net-next,5/5] hv_netvsc: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense
> >
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=c86ab60b92d1
> 
> On reflection I probably should have asked you for a fixes tag and
> applied it to net :S  Oh well.

I thought about including a Fixes: tag, but decided that since current and
past builds don't exhibit a failure due to this issue, it's not necessary to
backport. The patches are more for robustness against future changes.
I've heard differing views on whether changes that aren't fixing an
actual failure should be backported ....

Also, patchwork bot email says that the *series* was applied to net-next.
But appears that's not the case.  Only the network-related patch from the
series was applied.  Still need the SCSI maintainer to pick up the SCSI patch,
and the Hyper-V maintainer to pick up the others.

Thanks,

Michael