[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ttdsi6lz.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 11:02:00 +0200
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Sean Christopherson
<seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] KVM: selftests: Mask off OSPKE and OSXSAVE when
comparing CPUID entries
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> writes:
> Mask off OSPKE and OSXSAVE, which are toggled based on corresponding CR4
> enabling bits, when comparing vCPU CPUID against KVM's supported CPUID.
> This will allow setting OSXSAVE by default when creating vCPUs, without
> causing test failures (KVM doesn't enumerate OSXSAVE=1).
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cpuid_test.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cpuid_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cpuid_test.c
> index f7fdcef5fa59..7b3fda6842bc 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cpuid_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/cpuid_test.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,12 @@ static struct cpuid_mask get_const_cpuid_mask(const struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *ent
> memset(&mask, 0xff, sizeof(mask));
>
> switch (entry->function) {
> + case 0x1:
> + mask.regs[X86_FEATURE_OSXSAVE.reg] &= ~BIT(X86_FEATURE_OSXSAVE.bit);
> + break;
> + case 0x7:
> + mask.regs[X86_FEATURE_OSPKE.reg] &= ~BIT(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE.bit);
> + break;
> case 0xd:
> /*
> * CPUID.0xD.{0,1}.EBX enumerate XSAVE size based on the current
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists