linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PCI/PM: Put devices to low power state on shutdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <74f2c388-b622-4304-bbc9-2f1dceaef6c3@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 17:26:25 +0800
From: Kai-Heng Feng <kaihengf@...dia.com>
To: "Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)" <acelan.kao@...onical.com>,
 Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
 mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/PM: Put devices to low power state on shutdown

On 2024/10/4 12:33 PM, Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 02:38:20PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> On 9/11/2024 14:16, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>> On 9/11/2024 14:05, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 02:24:11PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>>>>> Some laptops wake up after poweroff when HP Thunderbolt Dock G4 is
>>>>> connected.
>>>>>
>>>>> The following error message can be found during shutdown:
>>>>> pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Correctable error message received
>>>>> from 0000:09:04.0
>>>>> pcieport 0000:09:04.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Correctable,
>>>>> type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver ID)
>>>>> pcieport 0000:09:04.0:   device [8086:0b26] error
>>>>> status/mask=00000080/00002000
>>>>> pcieport 0000:09:04.0:    [ 7] BadDLLP
>>>>>
>>>>> Calling aer_remove() during shutdown can quiesce the error message,
>>>>> however the spurious wakeup still happens.
>>>>>
>>>>> The issue won't happen if the device is in D3 before system shutdown, so
>>>>> putting device to low power state before shutdown to solve the issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't have a sniffer so this is purely guesswork, however I believe
>>>>> putting device to low power state it's the right thing to do.
>>>>
>>>> My objection here is that we don't have an explanation of why this
>>>> should matter or a pointer to any spec language about this situation,
>>>> so it feels a little bit random.
>>>>
>>>> I suppose the problem wouldn't happen if AER interrupts were disabled?
>>>> We already do disable them in aer_suspend(), but maybe that's not used
>>>> in the shutdown path?
>>>>
>>>> My understanding is that .shutdown() should turn off device interrupts
>>>> and stop DMA.  So maybe we need an aer_shutdown() that disables
>>>> interrupts?
>>>>
>>>
>>> IMO I see this commit as two problems with the same solution.
>>>
>>> I don't doubt that cleaning up AER interrupts in the shutdown path would
>>> help AER messages, but you really don't "want" devices to be in D0 when
>>> the system is "off" because even if the system is off some rails are
>>> still active and the device might still be powered.
>>>
>>> A powered device could cause interrupts (IE a spurious wakeup).
>>
>> It's a bit of a stretch, but ACPI 7.4.2.5 and 7.4.2.6 are the closest
>> corollary to a spec I can find.
>>
>> "Devices states are compatible with the current Power Resource states. In
>> other words, all devices are in the D3 state when the system state is S4."
>>
>> https://uefi.org/htmlspecs/ACPI_Spec_6_4_html/07_Power_and_Performance_Mgmt/oem-supplied-system-level-control-methods.html
> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to revive this thread and support this description from the
> ACPI spec.
> 
> In ACPI 7.4.2.5, it states: "All devices are in the D3 state when the
> system state is S4," and in ACPI 7.4.2.6, it says: "The S5 state is
> similar to the S4 state except that OSPM does not save any context."
> 
> I believe this implies that devices should also be in D3 when the
> system is in S5.

Sorry for the belated response.

I think AceLan found a better explanation on why this patch is needed.

I can resend the patch with modified message if Bjorn agrees.

Kai-Heng

> 
>>
>>>
>>>>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219036
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 8 ++++++++
>>>>>    1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>>>>> index af2996d0d17f..4c6f66f3eb54 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>>>>> @@ -510,6 +510,14 @@ static void pci_device_shutdown(struct device *dev)
>>>>>        if (drv && drv->shutdown)
>>>>>            drv->shutdown(pci_dev);
>>>>> +    /*
>>>>> +     * If driver already changed device's power state, it can mean the
>>>>> +     * wakeup setting is in place, or a workaround is used.
>>>>> Hence keep it
>>>>> +     * as is.
>>>>> +     */
>>>>> +    if (!kexec_in_progress && pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D0)
>>>>> +        pci_prepare_to_sleep(pci_dev);
>>>>> +
>>>>>        /*
>>>>>         * If this is a kexec reboot, turn off Bus Master bit on the
>>>>>         * device to tell it to not continue to do DMA. Don't touch
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> 2.43.0
>>>>>
>>>
>>