[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241004100742.GO18071@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 12:07:42 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mhklinux@...look.com
Cc: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
decui@...rosoft.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
robin.murphy@....com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] hyper-v: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 08:53:28PM -0700, mhkelley58@...il.com wrote:
>
> Michael Kelley (5):
> x86/hyperv: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense
> Drivers: hv: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense
> iommu/hyper-v: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense
> scsi: storvsc: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense
> hv_netvsc: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense
Thanks, these look sane.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists