linux-kernel - Re: [BUG almost bisected] Splat in dequeue_rt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241004133532.GH33184@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:35:32 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [BUG almost bisected] Splat in dequeue_rt_stack() and build error

On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 08:50:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 09:04:30AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 04:22:40PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 05:45:47AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I ran 100*TREE03 for 18 hours each, and got 23 instances of *something*
> > > > happening (and I need to suppress stalls on the repeat).  One of the
> > > > earlier bugs happened early, but sadly not this one.
> > > 
> > > Damn, I don't have the amount of CPU hours available you mention in your
> > > later email. I'll just go up the rounds to 20 minutes and see if
> > > something wants to go bang before I have to shut down the noise
> > > pollution for the day...
> > 
> > Indeed, this was one reason I was soliciting debug patches.  ;-)
> 
> Sooo... I was contemplating if something like the below might perhaps
> help some. It's a bit of a mess (I'll try and clean up if/when it
> actually proves to work), but it compiles and survives a hand full of 1m
> runs.
> 
> I'll try and give it more runs tomorrow when I can power up the big
> machines again -- unless you've already told me it's crap by then :-)

I've given it 200*20m and the worst I got was one dl-server double
enqueue. I'll go stare at that I suppose.