[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241004133953.494445-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:39:38 +0200
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To: chuan.liu@...ogic.com,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] clk: core: refine disable unused clocks
As it as been pointed out numerous times, flagging a clock with
CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED does _not_ guarantee that clock left enabled will stay
on. The clock will get disabled if any enable/disable cycle happens on it
or its parent clocks.
Because enable/disable cycles will disable unused clocks,
clk_disable_unused() should not trigger such cycle. Doing so disregard
the flag if set for any parent clocks. This is problematic with
CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE handling.
To solve this, and a couple other issues, pass the parent status to the
child while walking the subtree, and return whether child ignored disable,
or not.
* Knowing the parent status allows to safely disable clocks with
CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE when the parent is enabled. Otherwise it means
that, while the clock is not gated it is effectively disabled. Turning on
the parents to sanitize the sitation would bring back our initial
problem, so just let it sanitize itself when the clock gets used.
* If a clock is not actively used (enabled_count == 0), does not have
CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED but the hw enabled all the way to the root clock, and a
child ignored the disable, it should ignore the disable too. Doing so
avoids disabling what is feading the children. Let the flag trickle down
the tree. This has the added benefit to transfer the information to the
unprepare path, so we don't unprepare the parent of a clock that ignored
a disable.
* An enabled clock must be prepared in CCF but we can't rely solely on
counts at clk_disable_unused() stage. Make sure an enabled clock is
considered prepared too, even if does not implement the related callback.
Also make sure only disabled clocks get unprepared.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
---
This is sent as an RFC to continue the discussion started by Chuan.
It is not meant to be applied as it is.
drivers/clk/clk.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index d02451f951cf..41c4504a41f1 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -332,17 +332,6 @@ static bool clk_core_is_enabled(struct clk_core *core)
}
}
- /*
- * This could be called with the enable lock held, or from atomic
- * context. If the parent isn't enabled already, we can't do
- * anything here. We can also assume this clock isn't enabled.
- */
- if ((core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE) && core->parent)
- if (!clk_core_is_enabled(core->parent)) {
- ret = false;
- goto done;
- }
-
ret = core->ops->is_enabled(core->hw);
done:
if (core->rpm_enabled)
@@ -1454,22 +1443,39 @@ static void clk_core_disable_unprepare(struct clk_core *core)
clk_core_unprepare_lock(core);
}
-static void __init clk_unprepare_unused_subtree(struct clk_core *core)
+static bool __init clk_unprepare_unused_subtree(struct clk_core *core,
+ bool parent_prepared)
{
struct clk_core *child;
+ bool prepared;
lockdep_assert_held(&prepare_lock);
+ /*
+ * Relying on count is not possible at this stage, so consider
+ * prepared an enabled clock, in case only .is_enabled() is
+ * implemented
+ */
+ if (parent_prepared)
+ prepared = (clk_core_is_prepared(core) ||
+ clk_core_is_enabled(core));
+ else
+ prepared = false;
+
hlist_for_each_entry(child, &core->children, child_node)
- clk_unprepare_unused_subtree(child);
+ if (clk_unprepare_unused_subtree(child, prepared) &&
+ prepared && !core->prepare_count)
+ core->flags |= CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED;
- if (core->prepare_count)
- return;
+ if (core->flags & CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED || core->prepare_count)
+ goto out;
- if (core->flags & CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED)
- return;
+ if (!parent_prepared && (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE))
+ goto out;
- if (clk_core_is_prepared(core)) {
+ /* Do not unprepare an enabled clock */
+ if (clk_core_is_prepared(core) &&
+ !clk_core_is_enabled(core)) {
trace_clk_unprepare(core);
if (core->ops->unprepare_unused)
core->ops->unprepare_unused(core->hw);
@@ -1477,27 +1483,50 @@ static void __init clk_unprepare_unused_subtree(struct clk_core *core)
core->ops->unprepare(core->hw);
trace_clk_unprepare_complete(core);
}
+
+out:
+ return (core->flags & CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED) && prepared;
}
-static void __init clk_disable_unused_subtree(struct clk_core *core)
+static bool __init clk_disable_unused_subtree(struct clk_core *core,
+ bool parent_enabled)
{
struct clk_core *child;
unsigned long flags;
+ bool enabled;
lockdep_assert_held(&prepare_lock);
- hlist_for_each_entry(child, &core->children, child_node)
- clk_disable_unused_subtree(child);
+ flags = clk_enable_lock();
- if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
- clk_core_prepare_enable(core->parent);
+ /* Check if the clock is enabled from root to this clock */
+ if (parent_enabled)
+ enabled = clk_core_is_enabled(core);
+ else
+ enabled = false;
- flags = clk_enable_lock();
+ hlist_for_each_entry(child, &core->children, child_node)
+ /*
+ * If any child ignored disable, this clock should too,
+ * unless there is, valid reason for the clock to be enabled
+ */
+ if (clk_disable_unused_subtree(child, enabled) &&
+ enabled && !core->enable_count)
+ core->flags |= CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED;
- if (core->enable_count)
+ if (core->flags & CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED || core->enable_count)
goto unlock_out;
- if (core->flags & CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED)
+ /*
+ * If the parent is disabled but the gate is open, we should sanitize
+ * the situation. This will avoid an unexpected enable of the clock as
+ * soon as the parent is enabled, without control of CCF.
+ *
+ * Doing so is not possible with a CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE clock without
+ * forcefully enabling a whole part of the subtree. Just let the
+ * situation resolve it self on the first enable of the clock
+ */
+ if (!parent_enabled && (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE))
goto unlock_out;
/*
@@ -1516,8 +1545,7 @@ static void __init clk_disable_unused_subtree(struct clk_core *core)
unlock_out:
clk_enable_unlock(flags);
- if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
- clk_core_disable_unprepare(core->parent);
+ return (core->flags & CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED) && enabled;
}
static bool clk_ignore_unused __initdata;
@@ -1550,16 +1578,16 @@ static int __init clk_disable_unused(void)
clk_prepare_lock();
hlist_for_each_entry(core, &clk_root_list, child_node)
- clk_disable_unused_subtree(core);
+ clk_disable_unused_subtree(core, true);
hlist_for_each_entry(core, &clk_orphan_list, child_node)
- clk_disable_unused_subtree(core);
+ clk_disable_unused_subtree(core, true);
hlist_for_each_entry(core, &clk_root_list, child_node)
- clk_unprepare_unused_subtree(core);
+ clk_unprepare_unused_subtree(core, true);
hlist_for_each_entry(core, &clk_orphan_list, child_node)
- clk_unprepare_unused_subtree(core);
+ clk_unprepare_unused_subtree(core, true);
clk_prepare_unlock();
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists