lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jkbQG4A+saKDfCz6g2-A=rZ2y34k2v9jA9uhp9A17ZBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:43:53 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, 
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, 
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] thermal: core: Reference count the zone in thermal_zone_get_by_id()

On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 3:37 PM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/4/24 14:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi Łukasz,
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 10:01 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Rafael,
> >>
> >> On 10/3/24 13:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >>>
> >>> There are places in the thermal netlink code where nothing prevents
> >>> the thermal zone object from going away while being accessed after it
> >>> has been returned by thermal_zone_get_by_id().
> >>>
> >>> To address this, make thermal_zone_get_by_id() get a reference on the
> >>> thermal zone device object to be returned with the help of get_device(),
> >>> under thermal_list_lock, and adjust all of its callers to this change
> >>> with the help of the cleanup.h infrastructure.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 1ce50e7d408e ("thermal: core: genetlink support for events/cmd/sampling")
> >>> Cc: 6.8+ <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 6.8+
> >>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> v1 -> v2: Use the cleanup.h infrastructure to reduce the amount of code changes.
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>>    drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c    |    1 +
> >>>    drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h    |    3 +++
> >>>    drivers/thermal/thermal_netlink.c |    9 +++------
> >>>    3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> >>> ===================================================================
> >>> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> >>> +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> >>> @@ -728,6 +728,7 @@ struct thermal_zone_device *thermal_zone
> >>>        mutex_lock(&thermal_list_lock);
> >>>        list_for_each_entry(tz, &thermal_tz_list, node) {
> >>>                if (tz->id == id) {
> >>> +                     get_device(&tz->device);
> >>>                        match = tz;
> >>>                        break;
> >>>                }
> >>> Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h
> >>> ===================================================================
> >>> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h
> >>> +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h
> >>> @@ -194,6 +194,9 @@ int for_each_thermal_governor(int (*cb)(
> >>>
> >>>    struct thermal_zone_device *thermal_zone_get_by_id(int id);
> >>>
> >>> +DEFINE_CLASS(thermal_zone_get_by_id, struct thermal_zone_device *,
> >>> +          if (_T) put_device(&_T->device), thermal_zone_get_by_id(id), int id)
> >>> +
> >>>    static inline bool cdev_is_power_actor(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
> >>>    {
> >>>        return cdev->ops->get_requested_power && cdev->ops->state2power &&
> >>> Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_netlink.c
> >>> ===================================================================
> >>> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/thermal_netlink.c
> >>> +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_netlink.c
> >>> @@ -443,7 +443,6 @@ static int thermal_genl_cmd_tz_get_trip(
> >>>    {
> >>>        struct sk_buff *msg = p->msg;
> >>>        const struct thermal_trip_desc *td;
> >>> -     struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
> >>>        struct nlattr *start_trip;
> >>>        int id;
> >>>
> >>> @@ -452,7 +451,7 @@ static int thermal_genl_cmd_tz_get_trip(
> >>>
> >>>        id = nla_get_u32(p->attrs[THERMAL_GENL_ATTR_TZ_ID]);
> >>>
> >>> -     tz = thermal_zone_get_by_id(id);
> >>> +     CLASS(thermal_zone_get_by_id, tz)(id);
> >>>        if (!tz)
> >>>                return -EINVAL;
> >>>
> >>> @@ -488,7 +487,6 @@ out_cancel_nest:
> >>>    static int thermal_genl_cmd_tz_get_temp(struct param *p)
> >>>    {
> >>>        struct sk_buff *msg = p->msg;
> >>> -     struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
> >>>        int temp, ret, id;
> >>>
> >>>        if (!p->attrs[THERMAL_GENL_ATTR_TZ_ID])
> >>> @@ -496,7 +494,7 @@ static int thermal_genl_cmd_tz_get_temp(
> >>>
> >>>        id = nla_get_u32(p->attrs[THERMAL_GENL_ATTR_TZ_ID]);
> >>>
> >>> -     tz = thermal_zone_get_by_id(id);
> >>> +     CLASS(thermal_zone_get_by_id, tz)(id);
> >>>        if (!tz)
> >>>                return -EINVAL;
> >>>
> >>> @@ -514,7 +512,6 @@ static int thermal_genl_cmd_tz_get_temp(
> >>>    static int thermal_genl_cmd_tz_get_gov(struct param *p)
> >>>    {
> >>>        struct sk_buff *msg = p->msg;
> >>> -     struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
> >>>        int id, ret = 0;
> >>>
> >>>        if (!p->attrs[THERMAL_GENL_ATTR_TZ_ID])
> >>> @@ -522,7 +519,7 @@ static int thermal_genl_cmd_tz_get_gov(s
> >>>
> >>>        id = nla_get_u32(p->attrs[THERMAL_GENL_ATTR_TZ_ID]);
> >>>
> >>> -     tz = thermal_zone_get_by_id(id);
> >>> +     CLASS(thermal_zone_get_by_id, tz)(id);
> >>>        if (!tz)
> >>>                return -EINVAL;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> I wasn't aware of that helpers in cleanup.h.
> >>
> >> Could you help me to understand when this this
> >> 'if (_T) put_device((&_T->device)' will be called?
> >
> > When the pointer variable initialized via the CLASS() macro goes out
> > of scope (that is, before freeing the memory occupied by the pointer
> > itself).
>
>
> OK, so do we still need the old code in
> thermal_zone_device_unregister(), which calls
> put_device(&tz->device) ?

Yes, we do.

> Maybe that code can go away?

That particular one drops the reference acquired by device_register()
and I don't see an alternative clean way to drop it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ