linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add SA8775P display clock controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7a9e1523-675b-4e1e-9233-51a0b4ed2895@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 16:07:33 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
 Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
 quic_imrashai@...cinc.com, quic_jkona@...cinc.com,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add SA8775P display
 clock controllers

On 04/10/2024 11:31, Taniya Das wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/13/2024 10:35 AM, Taniya Das wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/6/2024 5:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 18/08/2024 20:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 12:01:47PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>>>>> Add device tree bindings for the display clock controllers
>>>>> on Qualcomm SA8775P platform.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   .../bindings/clock/qcom,sa8775p-dispcc.yaml        | 79 
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>   include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sa8775p-dispcc.h    | 87 
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>   2 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> Un-reviewed.
>>>
>>> We achieved consensus allowing sa8775p to stay, but now Qualcomm changes
>>> point of view and insists on new approach of dropping sa8775p. Therefore
>>> this change does not make much sense in the new approach.
>>>
>>
>> Krzysztof could you please re-review the patches again? As I understand 
>> that Qualcomm will support both SA8775p and QCS9100 in Kernel. There’s 
>> no plan to drop SA8775p support. These two SoCs will keep compatible.
>>
> Krzysztof, Could you please help reviewing the patches again?

They are not in the patchwork anymore, not in my inbox, so I cannot
review them.

Please resend.

That's generic rule - don't ping needlessly multiple times, but resend.

Best regards,
Krzysztof