[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zv_87TBZnh2lIwyH@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:34:21 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kasong@...cent.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+fa43f1b63e3aa6f66329@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: swap: prevent possible data-race in
__try_to_reclaim_swap
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 11:25:04PM +0900, Jeongjun Park wrote:
> A report [1] was uploaded from syzbot.
>
> In the previous commit 862590ac3708 ("mm: swap: allow cache reclaim to skip
> slot cache"), the __try_to_reclaim_swap() function reads offset and nr_pages
> from folio without folio_lock protection.
Umm. You don't need folio_lock to read nr_pages. Holding a refcount
is sufficient to stabilise nr_pages. I cannot speak to folio->swap
though (and the KCSAN report does appear to be pointing to folio->swap).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists