linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] platform/x86/tuxedo: Add virtual LampArray for TUXEDO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8874c084-20b2-44d8-9a0d-67aedad4b456@tuxedocomputers.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 16:36:36 +0200
From: Werner Sembach <wse@...edocomputers.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: bentiss@...nel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, hdegoede@...hat.com,
 jelle@...aa.nl, jikos@...nel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
 miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com, ojeda@...nel.org, onitake@...il.com,
 pavel@....cz, cs@...edo.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] platform/x86/tuxedo: Add virtual LampArray for
 TUXEDO


Am 03.10.24 um 09:59 schrieb Lee Jones:
> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024, Werner Sembach wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 02.10.24 um 14:52 schrieb Lee Jones:
>>> On Fri, 27 Sep 2024, Werner Sembach wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> first revision integrating Armins feedback.
>>>>
>>>> Stuff I did not yet change and did not comment on previously:
>>>> - Still have to ask Christoffer why the mutex is required
>>>> - Still using acpi_size instad of size_t in the util functions, because the value is put directly into a struct using acpi_size
>>>> - Error messages for __wmi_method_acpi_object_out still in that method because they reference method internal variables
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if my reasoning is flawed
>>> Use `git format-patch`'s --annotate and --compose next time please.
>>>
>> I did but --compose does not automatically insert the subject line, that's
>> why i copied it but forgot to change it to 0/1
>>
>> Sorry for the flawed subject line
> And the missing diff-stat?
>
Also not automatically created by git send-email --compose. is there a flag I'm 
not aware of?