linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 01/43] KVM: Prepare for handling only shared mappings in mmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20241004152804.72508-2-steven.price@arm.com>
Date: Fri,  4 Oct 2024 16:27:22 +0100
From: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>,
	Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
	linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@...amperecomputing.com>,
	Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
	Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>,
	Alper Gun <alpergun@...gle.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 01/43] KVM: Prepare for handling only shared mappings in mmu_notifier events

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>

Add flags to "struct kvm_gfn_range" to let notifier events target only
shared and only private mappings, and write up the existing mmu_notifier
events to be shared-only (private memory is never associated with a
userspace virtual address, i.e. can't be reached via mmu_notifiers).

Add two flags so that KVM can handle the three possibilities (shared,
private, and shared+private) without needing something like a tri-state
enum.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZJX0hk+KpQP0KUyB@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
---
 include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index db567d26f7b9..1d3f09fd360c 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ struct kvm_gfn_range {
 	gfn_t start;
 	gfn_t end;
 	union kvm_mmu_notifier_arg arg;
+	bool only_private;
+	bool only_shared;
 	bool may_block;
 };
 bool kvm_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 05cbb2548d99..cca9e6b91854 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -631,6 +631,13 @@ static __always_inline kvm_mn_ret_t __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm,
 			 * the second or later invocation of the handler).
 			 */
 			gfn_range.arg = range->arg;
+
+			/*
+			 * HVA-based notifications aren't relevant to private
+			 * mappings as they don't have a userspace mapping.
+			 */
+			gfn_range.only_private = false;
+			gfn_range.only_shared = true;
 			gfn_range.may_block = range->may_block;
 
 			/*
-- 
2.34.1