linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix IS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a2170a4a-d994-4729-9ade-aa20de4fefa1@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 15:16:02 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Lukas Bulwahn <lbulwahn@...hat.com>,
 Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@...il.com>,
 David E Box <david.e.box@...el.com>,
 Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
 platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix IS_ENABLED() check

Hi,

Lukas, thank you for your patch.

On 24-Sep-24 10:40 AM, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...hat.com>
> 
> Commit d7a87891e2f5 ("platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix build regression with
> pmtimer turned off") accidentally slips in some CONFIG_CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER
> (note the duplicated CONFIG prefix) in the IS_ENABLED() check.
> 
> Fortunately, ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py notices this accident. Fix up
> the IS_ENABLED() check with the intended config name.
> 
> Fixes: d7a87891e2f5 ("platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix build regression with pmtimer turned off")
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...hat.com>

I see that d7a87891e2f5 ("platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix build
regression with pmtimer turned off") does not exist in
Torvald's tree yet.

This comes from http://git.linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linux.git/log/?h=timers/drivers/next

Daniel, I appreciate you picking this up, but now that everything
has been merged together again in v6.12-rc1 I would prefer to
handle any further changes limited to drivers/platform/x86/intel/
through the pdx86 tree.

Also since this is a build fix it really should be send as a fix
fro the 6.12 cycle.

Daniel judging by the timers/drivers/next branch name I guess these
are not fixes targeting 6.12, right ?

In that case can you please drop d7a87891e2f5 ("platform/x86:intel/pmc:
fix build regression with pmtimer turned off") ?  Then I'll pick that
up and squash in this typo fix.

Or if you do plan to send things out as fixes to Linus, then please
add this patch too.

Regards,

Hans





> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> index 0431a599ba26..4387b5103701 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> @@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ static int pmc_core_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			       pmc_core_adjust_slp_s0_step(primary_pmc, 1));
>  
>  	map = primary_pmc->map;
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER) &&
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER) &&
>  	    map->acpi_pm_tmr_ctl_offset)
>  		acpi_pmtmr_register_suspend_resume_callback(pmc_core_acpi_pm_timer_suspend_resume,
>  							 pmcdev);
> @@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@ static void pmc_core_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	const struct pmc *pmc = pmcdev->pmcs[PMC_IDX_MAIN];
>  	const struct pmc_reg_map *map = pmc->map;
>  
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER) &&
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER) &&
>  	    map->acpi_pm_tmr_ctl_offset)
>  		acpi_pmtmr_unregister_suspend_resume_callback();
>