[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87cykevctv.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 15:33:48 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 3/5] KVM: arm64: Manage GCS access and registers for guests
On Sat, 05 Oct 2024 15:26:38 +0100,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 03:02:09PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > > Ah, I see. I'd been under the impression that the generic machinery was
> > > supposed to handle this already using the descriptions in
> > > emulate-nested.c and we only needed handlers for more specific actions.
>
> > From that very file:
>
> > /*
> > * Map encoding to trap bits for exception reported with EC=0x18.
> > [...]
> > */
>
> > Everything else needs special handling.
>
> I see. I had noticed that comment on that table but I didn't register
> that the comment wound up applying to the whole file rather than being
> about a specific part of the handling. I'm a bit confused about how
> things like the SVE traps I mentioned work here...
Like all ECs, the handling starts in handle_exit.c.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists