[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <127856ca-fb79-45f5-ad0a-8aa219bae85b@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 10:20:02 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Robert Richter
<rric@...nel.org>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, imx@...ts.linux.dev, York Sun <york.sun@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] EDAC: MAINTAINERS: change FSL DDR EDAC maintainer to
Frank Li
On 06/10/2024 10:08, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 09:33:48PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 636a84ccb5f6..03474c934930 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -8120,7 +8120,8 @@ S: Maintained
>> F: drivers/edac/e7xxx_edac.c
>>
>> EDAC-FSL_DDR
>> -M: York Sun <york.sun@....com>
>> +M: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
>
> Let's start by making Frank a reviewer first. I wanna see how we can
> work together, how responsive he is, etc.
>
> My experience so far is that most of those EDAC single driver
> "maintainers" become silent shortly after they get added so I'd like to
> avoid yet another such case.
Can you change it to R: when applying or you want v3?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists