[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024100620-decency-discuss-df6e@gregkh>
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 10:29:26 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Zichen Xie <zichenxie0106@...il.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rohit kumar <quic_rohkumar@...cinc.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@...il.com>,
Zijie Zhao <zzjas98@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: Fix NULL Dereference in
asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe()
On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 05:40:53PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > A devm_kzalloc() in asoc_qcom_lpass_cpu_platform_probe() could
>
> call?
>
>
> > possibly return NULL pointer. NULL Pointer Dereference may be
> > triggerred without addtional check.
> …
>
> * How do you think about to use the term “null pointer dereference”
> for the final commit message (including the summary phrase)?
>
> * Would you like to avoid any typos here?
>
>
> …
> > ---
> > sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c | 2 ++
>
> Did you overlook to add a version description behind the marker line?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.12-rc1#n723
>
> Regards,
> Markus
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists